A Coup In Niger: No Mr President, We Can’t Go To War With Niger:

Prof. S A Zuru ( SAN )

I have read reactive commentaries on the military coup in Niger with utter indignation and revulsion. The truth of the matter is that, Niger is a sovereign state with sovereign rights to make its sovereign choices base on its peculiar national exigencies. Therefore, we must as a Country respect the Articles of the UN Charter on non interference in the internal affairs of independent member Nation State. Perhaps, at this juncture, we must resist the temptation and the nagging toxic urge for the inter continental and subregional power play and the taunted disastrous military adventurism. Besides, when did we become a Continental policeman for enforcement of democratic patent. Mr President, let the hawks at the Pentagon pushing for the calamitous military intervention in Niger share with you a chapter on their stupendous transnational military adventurism and the resultant historical landmark defeat in Vietnam and account of their bloodied nose in Elsalvado, Nicaragua and their delicious humiliation at the bay of pigs in Cuba. Not the least though, the epitaph of their recent embarrassing military intervention and escape from Afghanistan before you take a bloodied leap into the dark. The truth is that, any such intervention could immediately transform our third grade banditry into a very dangerous jihadist crusade against the infidel Nigeria. As far as we can recall, the most painful lesson from Nigeria’s Islamist insurgency in the Northeast, was the tragic irony of the fact that ethnic loyalties are far more deeper and darker in the conscience of tribesmen than the loyalties of citizenship and nationality. The awkward situation of Nigeria is that, in all the border states of the country, hardly will you find an extended family without direct biological fraternity with their biological relatives across the border. Therefore, let us be careful what we wished ourselves. For God’s sake, let us have the generosity of wisdom to learn from the tragedy of American military cum democratic crusade in Afghanistan, which became the rallying cry for the rise of radical islamism amongst the Taliban and the Afghan Mujahideen before them. According to Tom Carew in his book “ The Jihad “ in particular Chapter 1, 2 and 3, the declaration of jihad by the Taliban received the profound loyalty, tribal commitments and outpouring solidarity from across the border in lawless region of Baluchistan in Pakistan particularly, around the mountainous region of Tora Bora. Mr President, unless we conduct a robust due diligence on the evolving situation in Niger, we may end up with similar un intending outcome from the increasingly misguided advocated military intervention in Niger. Additionally, it is instructive the growing rejection within the organized international community of military intervention as a solution to an international crisis or as a pretext for the restoration of International law and order in the context of domestic affairs of independent sovereign state. It was extraordinary and perhaps, unprecedented to hear American Gods of war rejecting the America’s gangho thesis on transnational military intervention. General David Petraeus ( the most decorated American General of his generation and the supreme allied commander in Iraq and Afghanistan ) and General Wisely Clarke ( a one time supreme allied commander at NATO ) have both discredited the thesis of military intervention as a panacea for the defense of the international democratic enterprise. Furthermore, on the trajectory of the resolution of heads of governments of ECOWAS sanctioning military intervention in Niger, I absolutely share the opinions of some of the leading lights of International Law on this issue. According to Professors Ian Brownlie ( with due respect ), P. Sands ( with due respect ) and Professor Roselyn Higgins ( with due respect ) one time the president of the International Court of Justice, multilateral resolutions do not amount to binding international treaty law and thus, do not create a binding multilateral treaty obligation, therefore, they are not legally enforceable. On a final note, Mr President, just because you have a hammer, does not mean that every problem must look like a nail. In the same spirit, where everybody is thinking the same, then, someone else is not thinking. Let government sustain the current diplomacy until a solution is found, every problem discussed is a problem solved. In the compelling wisdom of Winston Churchill, “ it is better to jaw jaw than to war war “